<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : Google Squared: L&#8217;outil id&#233;al pour comparer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberry-fr.com/1565/google-squared-loutil-idal-pour-comparer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberry-fr.com/1565/google-squared-loutil-idal-pour-comparer/</link>
	<description>Votre source d&#039;actualités Blackberry en français, Bold, Storm, Pearl, Curve</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Par : RemiOberan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberry-fr.com/1565/google-squared-loutil-idal-pour-comparer/comment-page-1/#comment-12307</link>
		<dc:creator>RemiOberan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberry-fr.com/1565/google-squared-loutil-idal-pour-comparer/#comment-12307</guid>
		<description>In fact I am really disppointed by GSquared.

It should have been : &quot;your search results put in smart table&quot;

But it is only : a strong selection of only ONE ROW by item put in a smart table.

So where a google search results in thousands of rows, a GSquared frequently gives five or ten !
And no easy way to get these missing rows.

The main GSquarred rule should be : Do not loose any rows, only improve their organization. 
The work that is done is great and so it is a pitty to restrain the final result like this.

I can easyly imagine that GSquared choose certains rows as representative of the item showed. But let give us access to all the other rows coresponding to the same Item. Maybe by clicking a &#039;+&#039; button...

I do this writing because I am a Google fan and I really think that this big default could be changed esyly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact I am really disppointed by GSquared.</p>
<p>It should have been : &#8220;your search results put in smart table&#8221;</p>
<p>But it is only : a strong selection of only ONE ROW by item put in a smart table.</p>
<p>So where a google search results in thousands of rows, a GSquared frequently gives five or ten !<br />
And no easy way to get these missing rows.</p>
<p>The main GSquarred rule should be : Do not loose any rows, only improve their organization.<br />
The work that is done is great and so it is a pitty to restrain the final result like this.</p>
<p>I can easyly imagine that GSquared choose certains rows as representative of the item showed. But let give us access to all the other rows coresponding to the same Item. Maybe by clicking a &#8216;+&#8217; button&#8230;</p>
<p>I do this writing because I am a Google fan and I really think that this big default could be changed esyly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
